An Article On His Theory Using Prayer And Scripture

Summary Yang-Tan (2007) wrote an article introducing his theory using prayer and scripture to treat patients. Yang-Tan (2007) discuss two models the first, is called self-regulations which focus on recognition of mental events in the present moment and the second is involves adapting to openness and acceptance. Yang-Tang(2007) model combines prayer and scripture to help patience’s heal from their problems. The goal is to help patients to feel whole and experience healing through God. All patients sign an consent form to agree to this form of treatment. Yang-Tan (2007) has used this method for over 25 years, in different therapeutic settings as well as bible colleges. The method includes eight biblical approach, 1.To show Gods love and†¦show more content†¦Implicit refers to the discussion of religion and spiritual issues, but does not have an open discussion of spiritual resources. Explicit uses spiritual resources in therapy such as prayer and scripture. Both methods are effective, however it depends on the client needs depending on which method a therapist would use. Yang-Tan (2007) states that CBT method involves the explicit integration, and it goes along with therapists who practice a more structured and problem-solving style of therapy. However Yang-Tan (2007) own practice he has used the explicit integration approach for all types of emotional problems such as anxiety disorders, stress and family problems, but not limited to bipolar disorder and epilepsy pain. The first session starts with a 2 hour intake which wi ll determine if prayer and scripture will be used. Pray is not used in every session, it is used when appropriate. Yang-Tan (2007) also uses another approach inner healing prayer, there are 7 steps to inner healing prayer. 1. Begin with prayer for protection from evil, allow the Holy Spirit to take control. 2. Help the client to relax by using relaxation strategies. 3. Help the client recall a painful past event or trauma. 4. Allow the Holy Spirit to come and lead the moment. 5. Wait to hear from the Lord, wait quietly to hear from the Lord. 6. Close in prayer. 7. Discuss the inner healing and the session my assign an assignment to do at home. The goal is for healing and to feel whole. Through prayer

Who Is Edward De Vere And The Life Of William Shakespeare

Who is Edward de Vere? Family To understand whether or not Edward de Vere was William Shakespeare, I must first describe the life of Edward de Vere and the life of William Shakespeare. Edward de Vere was the 17th Earl of Oxford and can sometimes be known as Oxford. It is know that he was born April 12, 1550 at Castle Hedingham (the family’s ancestral) and died June 24, 1660. John de Vere his father was Lord Great Chamberlain died in 1562. His mother was Margaret Golding. After John de Vere’s death Margaret married Charles Tyrell and seem to have passed out of Oxford’s life for unknown reasons. John de Vere and Margaret Golding also had a girl named Mary who went to live with her mom and step dad. With both of his parents out of his life,†¦show more content†¦His daily studies include: dancing, French, Latin, writing, drawing, cosmography, penmanship, riding, shooting, exercise and prayer. He also knew Botany. Edward de Vere quickly gathered a love for learning due to his two early le arning tutors, Sir Thomas Smith and Laurence Nowell. Sir Thomas Smith who was England’s most respected Greek scholar and the former Cambridge tutor of William Cecil. Smith was a scholar of widely varied interests, which was reflected in his 400-volume library. His second tutor was Laurence Nowell who was an accomplished cartographer, premier scholar of Anglo-Saxon literature but also obtains the only copy of Beowulf [The De Vere Society]. Another important educational influence of De Vere’s early studies was his maternal uncle Arthur Golding, an officer in the Court of Wards under Cecil, Arthur Golding is credited to translate Ovid’s Metamorphoses. In 1558, Oxford attended Cambridge and was awarded an honorary MA by Cambridge on a royal progress in August 1564 and another by Oxford University on a Royal progress in 1566. After Cambridge, De Vere later attended Gray’s Inn to study law. He was a child prodigy, Edward de Vere graduated from Oxford when he wa s 8 years old and by the time he was 13 his tutors who were the most knowledgeable educators said, â€Å"I can teach him no more.† Court and the Queen Edward de Vere grew up in the upper classShow MoreRelatedWilliam Shakespeare s Romeo And Juliet1733 Words   |  7 PagesShakespeare is a figure shrouded in mystery. In this paper, the title of â€Å"Shakespeare† will refer to the author of the works currently credited to William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon. Shakespeare is undoubtedly one of the most famous writers of all time. He created masterpieces like Hamlet, Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, and several more. For a long period of time, William Shakespeare from Stratford-upon-Avon was considered the author of all the works credited to Shakespeare. For over a centuryRead MoreThe Shakespeare Conspiracy Theory1561 Words   |  6 PagesWilliam Shakespeare, by far one of the greatest playwrights of all time, is clouded with controversy. Rumors run rampant that he was nothing more than a non de plume for someone who wished to keep the anonymity of his identity. There have been names such as Edward De Vere the 17th Earl of Oxf ord, Sir Francis Bacon, even Queen Elizabeth herself was among those thought to be the true writer of the plays and poems. To start from the beginning of the controversy, the earliest actual documentation ofRead MoreEssay on Did William Shakespeare Write the Plays and Sonnets or Not?1488 Words   |  6 PagesIt disputes whether Shakespeare himself wrote the plays and sonnets or if it was someone else writing under a pseudonym. There are countless theories of who the writer might actually be but the main suspects are Shakespeare himself, Edward de Vere, Sir Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, William Stanley, Roger Manners, Sir Walter Raleigh and Mary Sidney Herbert (Pressley). The first to be presumed the writer is Shakespeare himself. Many theorists believe it wasn’t Shakespeare due to the fact thatRead MoreEssay on Who Was The True Shakespeare? 1458 Words   |  6 PagesThe Shakespeare name is known by almost everyone. The true identity of the great writer is still a mystery. There isn’t a single picture to portray the true identity of Shakespeare. When you look at the pictures they are different and resemble someone else. We know that he was a well educated business man, knowledgeable in the law and Royalty just for starters. The man credited with the works doesn’t poses these qualities. Over the years, more people ask the same question, who was the trueRead MoreEssay on Shakespeare Authorship Controversy1504 Words   |  7 PagesShakespeare, the man who wrote 37 plays and more than a hundred sonnets, is known throughout the world. Many people consider him one of the best English playwrights of our time, others say that he was a genius. William Shakspere was born in Stratford-upon Avon in 1564 and died in 1616 at the age of 52. In the mid-19th century, questions had arisen about the Shakespeare authorship controversy, and many scholars wondered whether Shakspere, the man from Stratford, wrote the plays. Ralph W. EmersonRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s The Man From Stratford On Avon2092 Words   |  9 Pagesauthorship of Shakespeare is one that has been argued for centuries. While there are various theories to suggest that William Shakespeare, the man from Stratford on Avon was not the true author of the plays produced within his lifetime, one theory in particular seems to hold the most concrete evidence. The authorship theory about Edward de Vere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford seems to have the most historical evidence proving that he is the writer of the plays and sonnets under the pseudonym William ShakespeareRead More Shakespeare - Authorship Essays1781 Words   |  8 Pagesborn by the name of William Shakespeare. H e was born to a poor family, was given little education, and had no interaction with sophisticated society. Thirty-eight plays and over 150 sonnets are not attributed to this ignorant man. Those who believe that Shakespeare was the author have no definitive proof but instead point to Hamlet’s declaration: amp;quot;The play’s the thing(Satchell 71).amp;quot; The true author, however, lies hidden behind he name of Shakespeare. Edward de Vere the premier EarlRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s The Fraud1164 Words   |  5 PagesShakespeare the Fraud? Shakespeare was a playwright from Stratford upon Avon who had arguably the most significant influence on English literature and language. His works are still acclaimed to this day for their divine superiority, although debate has risen over the authenticity of his authorship. According to Dobson, reasons for doubting that William Shakespeare was in fact the author of his works include theories that he lacked the education, aristocratic awareness, or familiarity with the royalRead More William Shakespeare Essay2763 Words   |  12 PagesWilliam Shakespeare Ask anyone who Shakespeare was, and he or she will immediately rattle off at least three different plays that were required readings in English, not to mention a few blockbuster movies bearing his name. Many revere the works of Shakespeare as paramount in the world of literature, dedicating entire books, classes and festivals to the study and celebration of his work. Although the ancient language is a common stumbling block for even the most seasoned readers, his varied talesRead MoreWho Really Wrote Shakespeares Work794 Words   |  4 PagesWho really wrote Shakespeares works? One of the most well-known writers in history is also one of the most controversial writers. William Shakespeare has been credited to thirty-eight plays, but did he actually write all of them. The debate whether he wrote all of his plays has been debated for generations. One of the main reasons was if his education level was high enough to be a world-famous writer. But if Shakespeare didnt write his works, then who did?

Religion and Love in Mexico Essay Example For Students

Religion and Love in Mexico Essay Marriage in Colonial Mexico: Patriarchy and EconomyIn To Love, Honor, and Obey in Colonial Mexico, Patricia Seed argues that the Bourbon Century drastically changed the view of marriage in New Spain. She suggests that the emphasis on virtue and free will in marriage gave way to a new quasi-bourgeois family unit based upon status and patriarchal control. While this is true for the elite of eighteenth century New Spain, this could not have spread to the urban or rural poor. They did not have an overwhelming emphasis on economic prosperity or status and did not have a necessity for strict patriarchal order.The Bourbon order prompted changes in family structure. From the outset, there was a stringent focus on patriarchy and male dominance. Marriage was a decision not left for the to-be-married to decide out of love and desire, but an issue with which the entire family, especially the father, was involved. Instead of marriage being simply an expression of the mutual feelings of man and woman, it was a system of social and economic status in which the honor of patriarchal lineage was at stake. Children and parents alike had distinct visions of social moralities, but those of the father prevailed. This was the change, as described in Seeds text, of the Bourbon century in New Spain. However, this change was not fully encompassing. The urban and rural poor would not be affected nearly as much by patriarchal domination or the evolving status of honor. As social hierarchy began basing itself more upon economic ideas, New Spains poor population became increasingly disenfranchised. Members of the upper class were responsible for the elevated value of status. It was the fathers of well-off families in New Spain that were encouraged to marry honorable spouses as to not bring dishonor to the family name. The daughter of an elite family would be prodded to marry and an elite man simply because of his honorable status, not his honorable sense of rectitude or moral consciousness. The church was once a sanctuary to marry those who felt bonded by an unworldly devotion, but now the church served as administrator for the will of elite patriarchs. The lower class, being void of elites, the high status of honor, and overbearing patriarchy was exempt from this defiling of sanctity. For the urban and rural poor there was no vested interest in retaining status. They were at the bottom of what had become the class system of eighteenth century colonial Mexico. It is because of this that marriages among the lower classes perhaps remained graceful and sacred. Not tainted with economic avarice, poor children were most likely free to marry not bound by their fathers ulterior agenda. On the other hand, there was still a system of patriarchy present within the lower tiers and it may have had some influence over marital decisions. That is, perhaps lower class fathers were more interested in the virtue of honor instead of the status. Perhaps the church was seen within poor circles as a holy venue for the uniting of devotion and not as means for elite domination. While Seed does not discuss it, maybe the Bourbon century reforms leading to the economic elitism and patriarchal oversight of marriage did not affect the poor sector in the least. Not only did they not subscribe the ideas of honor-as-a-status, but they barely thought about it. Bourbon rule did propagate a change in the ideas of love, honor, and marriage in colonial Mexican society. Patricia Seed argues this in her book and cites substantive examples within the elite families of Mexico City. What she does not examine is the role urban and rural poor played in this change. Given the motives for the elites transition of the church and of the sanctity of marriage economic status, it should be asserted that the lower classes were not treated similarly and did not view or interpret honor and religion in the same fashion. .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f , .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .postImageUrl , .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f , .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f:hover , .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f:visited , .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f:active { border:0!important; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f:active , .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u084efe22ff9394fc70953f9d29fd5e0f:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: New Terror Essay Perhaps urban and rural poor still held honor as a virtue in high esteem and were not affected by the changing views of society. Perhaps there was a complete Urban Elite Bias.

Should States Raise Speed Limits

Table of Contents Safety concern Economic effects of raising speed limit Reduction of speed trap revenues and corruption Effects on environment Conclusion References Speed limits are often set by laws and statutes so as to inform â€Å"motorists of the highest speed that is considered to be safe and reasonable under favorable road, traffic, and whether conditions† (The Association of British Drivers, 2005). Most states in the United States still have speed limits that are set at 55 to 65 miles per hour.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Should States Raise Speed Limits specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The vehicle and speed legislation of the United States indicates that the speed limit was established so as to improve public safety. Some states have since revised their speed limits to higher speed limits. Most countries in Europe and Asia have speed limits of up to 85 miles per hour (Feigenbaum, 2011). T his paper will argue why states need to raise their speed limits from the current 55 miles per hour. Speed limits in the United States were higher than the current levels prior to the political oil crisis that was witnessed in 1973. Following the events of that year, the federal instituted established a speed limit of 55 miles per hour. States were required to implement this speed limit by 1988 or lose federal transportation funding (National motorist association, 1999). In the year 1995, the national speed limit was repealed and thus each state was allowed to establish its own speed limit. Many states still have speed limits that are lower than the 1pre 973 level. Safety concern The current speed limits set by states are mostly established as a safety measure. Each state in the U.S. has a basic speed statute that requires drivers to drive their vehicles at speed limit that is reasonable and cautious as per the existing conditions (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 199 8). The laws take into account that safety varies depends on the traffic, the road and whether and other conditions that may come into play. Several researches that have been carried out in regard to speed limit show that most motorists choose a speed limit with which they can reach their destination in the shortest time possible and one with which they will avoid endangering themselves, other people and properties (Feigenbaum, 2011). Most of these motorists often select a speed that takes into account the nature of the roadway, traffic and other conditions. The combined judgment of â€Å"motorists can be taken to represent the level of reasonable travel and acceptable risk† (Feigenbaum, 2011, pp. 5). Research has shown that, in most cases, the upper region of the risk that can be accepted is in the region of 85th percentile speed.Advertising Looking for essay on law? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More A study was conducte d to examine the data from 1995, the last year of a common low speed limit for all states, to 1997 when some states had implemented a raised speed limit for a full year (National motorist association, 1999). Comparing the data of the group that had raised their speed limits to those of unchanged speed limits, it was demonstrated that there was no significance difference in the fatality rates. Fatality rates had dropped in the two groups by a similar margin. This shows that by changing the speed limit the overall safety was not compromised (Feigenbaum, 2011). In order to establish the safety that is associated with different types of roads and traffic, the study included all roads that’s can be considered to be less safe to the safer and faster freeways. This study and others indicate that raising the speed limit to 85th percentile speed does not compromise safety on the roads. Opponents of raising the speed limit have always argued that it results into increased number of acc idents. Researches have actually confirmed the opposite. Available data shows that accidents reduce when the speed limit are increased. Part of the reason for this finding is that when a lower speed limit is set there will be drivers who will be obeying the speed limit and others who will be exceeding the set limit (Feigenbaum, 2011). The gaps between this two motorists increase the chances of accidents. Skeptics are often concerned with the increased number of pedestrians, especially in the rural interstates. They do not take into account the consideration that most rural roads have been fitted with safety and technology features that increases safety. However, the this argument is not completely opposed to the idea of low speed limits in circumstances such as high traffic, dense population and adverse weather conditions, as such conditions my compromise the safety. Economic effects of raising speed limit There are several economic effects that can be realized by raising the motorw ay speed in the United States. The most remarkable benefit that can be achieved following an increase in the maximum speed limit would be the value of the time saved (Feigenbaum, 2011). Studies have shown that if the maximum speed limit is increased to about 85th percentile speed then millions of vehicle hours will be saved per year, especially for cars and light goods vehicles. This would save up to 1 billion dollars annually as per year 2000 prices. Another economic benefit can be determined when time wasted on the road is put into consideration. People waste a lot of time on the road travelling from point A to point B. The delays extend to goods and other services that have a direct relationship with road transport. Unnecessary delays on the road will cause delays in the accomplishment of tasks such as late arrival for appointments; late delivery of vital goods that may be required to accomplish different tasks that may be vital for economic growth.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Should States Raise Speed Limits specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More If all this factors are put in place then one will realize that low speed limits are not necessary. States that have not adopted higher speed limits should make efforts to ensure that higher speed limits, for instance 85th percentile speed should be adopted, especially for roads that have less traffic. Critics have stated that increasing the speed limits has no any economic importance, citing the higher amount of fuel that is used for higher speeds. Studies have shown that vehicles use the list amount of gas when they are travelling at speeds of between 55 – 60 miles per hour (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1998). The difference between 55 miles per hour and the recommended higher speeds is between 15 – 20 miles per hour. Research has also shown that when the national 55 miles per hour speed level that was in place between 1978 and 1995, only reduced fuel consumption by one percent. If states increase their speeds by lets say 5 miles per hour then their will be an additional 0.3% increase in fuel or gasoline use. This figure is negligible considering the economic opportunities that are lost by the unnecessary delays on the roads (The Association of British Drivers, 2005). Some critics have also pointed towards the unprecedented increase in vehicle operating costs due to increased mechanical problems. The consensus is that an increase in the maximum speed limit would lead to a significant benefit to the economy as the value of the time saved will be much more than the operational costs, even during the times when fuel costs are high (Feigenbaum, 2011). The tax levied will simply be transferred from one part of the economy to another. Furthermore, an increase in fuel usage will ensure more income from fuel tax. â€Å"If the speed is increased, individual drivers will have to decide whether to take advantage of it, depending on the value they place on their time versus the increased costs they are likely to face† (Feigenbaum, 2011). Therefore motorists who think that they waste so much time in the traffic will likely take advantage of the situation. Thus people will have a wider variety of options on how they can manage their time and the costs incurred through motoring.Advertising Looking for essay on law? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Reduction of speed trap revenues and corruption It’s alleged that states and cities that have refused to adjust their speed limits often set speed traps as a vital source of revenue. This usually forces motorists to drive at speeds that are set below normal safe traffic flow speeds (Feigenbaum, 2011). Such motorist may be tempted to drive faster because they may be convinced that they will not endanger anyone by doing that. States that unfairly set speed limits below normal safe traffic flow speeds have tended to make revenues out of the fines charged from drivers who are driving at scientifically proven safe speeds (Feigenbaum, 2011). Setting speed limits may also encourage corruption as policemen are likely to take bribes from motorists who are caught driving faster than the set speed limit in a given state or city. This may be especially true for drivers who may not want to waste time by going to police stations, cells or courts to answer over speeding charges. Furthermore , a state that sets the speed limit below the normal safe limit may be experience unusually high number of traffic offences that involve over speeding or driving above the set speed limits. This may mean that so many people waste their valuable time going to police cells and courts for traffic offences. Such motorists may fail to accomplish other important activities and this may be economically damaging for them. If the value of the time wasted by motorists following arrests is quantified for a given state, then one can realize the damage being caused to the economy. What is more hurting is the fact that the speed limit most of the drivers are arrested for has been proven to be safe and is being applied elsewhere within the United States (Feigenbaum, 2011). Critics may argue that corruption as a vice is widespread all public sectors and thus should no be blamed on low speed limits or should not be limited to the traffic police officers. In regard to the police arrests, they may arg ue that drivers who are over speed are breaking the law and endangering the lives of other road users. Although it’s not right to break law, authorities should not set unfairly law speed limits that get motorists on the wrong side of the law. Effects on environment Critics have always stated that increasing speed limit creates a number of effects on the environment. First, they claim that this will worsen the effect air quality by a considerable percentage. Air quality agencies have set objectives for each pollutant depending on the desired standards of air quality (The Association of British Drivers, 2005). By increasing speed limits by about 15 to 20 miles per hour, the air quality strategy will still be on course to achieve the set objectives (The Association of British Drivers, 2005). The effects of raising the motorway speed limit on the emission of pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons, would be insignificant (National Hig hway Traffic Safety Administration, 1998). Critics have also claimed that increasing speed limit may increase greenhouse gas emissions (Feigenbaum, 2011). Several agencies have rejected the theory that man made carbon dioxide emissions may be responsible for climate change. Many researches provide indisputable evidences that changes in the climate can be explained (in the majority of cases) by changes of the sun activity. Conclusion This paper sought to argue for the point that it’s necessary for all states in the U. S to increase their speed limits. Indeed the paper has identified several points that support the argument. For instance, higher speeds such as 75 miles per hour have been found to be much safer than lower speed limits. Secondly, there are many ways through which the economy will benefit if the speed limits are to be raised in all the states. Most of points that have been advanced by critics to stop the speed limit adjustment are baseless. States can be compelled to implement higher speed limits but there is one major challenge of changing the public perception that the faster the speed the more dangerous it is. References Feigenbaum, B. (2011). Can’t Drive 55? Call to Increase Speed Limits in U.S. Web. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1998). The effects of Speed Limits in the Post-NMSL Era. Washington D.C: U. S. Department of Transportation. National motorist association. (1999). Foundation Study Shows: Safe To Raise Freeway Speed Limits. Web. The Association of British Drivers. (2005). Submission for the Raising of the Motorway Speed Limit. Web. This essay on Should States Raise Speed Limits was written and submitted by user Kyndall Durham to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.